1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 65 Wis.2d
  5. 65 Wis.2d 88 (1974)
 

BIESIADNY v. HENNINGFELD

No. 199.

65 Wis.2d 88 (1974)

221 N.W.2d 690

BIESIADNY, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. HENNINGFELD and others, Defendants and Respondents: MILWAUKEE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 1, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Cannon, McLaughlin, Herbon & Staudenmaier, attorneys, and L. William Staudenmaier of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the plaintiffs-respondents the cause was submitted on the brief of Habush, Gillick, Habush, Davis & Murphy, attorneys, and Howard A. Davis of counsel, all of Milwaukee.

For the defendant-respondent Robert E. Henningfeld the cause was submitted on the brief of Kluwin, Dunphy, Hankin & McNulty, all of Milwaukee.

Submitted under sec. (Rule) 251.54 September 10, 1974.

ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

Only one question is asked on this appeal: Was the insurer of the father entitled to summary judgment as to the claim against it based on the driving of the sod truck by the son? However, to answer this question, several questions have to be asked and answered, with the last answer to the last question deciding the issue raised.

Q. Was the sod truck a four-wheel motor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases