1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 388 F.Supp.
  5. 388 F.Supp. 1070 (1974)
 

GOODMAN v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 271-71.

388 F.Supp. 1070 (1974)

Robert J. GOODMAN, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Florence L. Goodman, Plaintiff, v. MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

December 30, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William R. Morris, Newark, N. J., for plaintiff.

Bernard Chazen, Englewood, N. J., for defendant.

OPINION

STERN, District Judge.

This is a diversity action. New Jersey resident Robert Goodman, as Executor of his wife's estate and individually, sues Mead Johnson & Co., a Delaware corporation, for injuries to Florence Goodman allegedly caused by defects in a product manufactured by the defendant.

The factual matrix of the complaint reveals that Florence Goodman used an ethical drug, Oracon,1 which was manufactured...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases