1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 515 S.W.2d
  5. 515 S.W.2d 929 (1974)
 

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY v. PRESTON

No. 7395.

515 S.W.2d 929 (1974)

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY (Exxon Corporation, Successor), Appellant, v. Jay M. PRESTON, Appellee.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

June 13, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. McGee and Carnegie H. Mims, Jr., Stephen D. Susman, William R. Pakalka, Fulbright & Jaworski, Houston, for appellant.

Charles H. Clark, Tyler, for appellee.

KEITH, Justice.

Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, we reconsider our prior judgment wherein the supporting opinion is reported in 487 S.W.2d 956. After the writ of error had been dismissed by the Supreme Court of Texas, Exxon appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States and that court noted probable jurisdiction. 414 U.S. 1038, 94 S.Ct. 538, 38 L.Ed.2d 328 (1973). Thereafter, plaintiff filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases