1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 529 P.2d
  5. 529 P.2d 910 (1974)
 

FRUTIGER v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

529 P.2d 910 (1974)

Warren L. FRUTIGER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Respondent. Elizabeth FRUTIGER, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided December 19, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert G. Chidester, Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellants.

Walter J. Apley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and Theodore W. de Looze, Chief Tax Counsel, Salem.

Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and McALLISTER, HOLMAN, TONGUE, HOWELL, BRYSON and SLOPER, JJ.

SLOPER, Justice (Pro Tem.).

This case is an appeal by plaintiffs from a decree of the Tax Court affirming an order of defendant holding that each of plaintiffs was personally liable for unpaid withholding taxes for the months of March, April and May 1969, for employees of P & F Mfg. Co., an Oregon Corporation. (OTC Nos. 765, 766, March 26, 1974) The separate suits of plaintiffs were consolidated by the Tax Court for purposes of trial and we have consolidated them...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases