1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 492 F.2d
  5. 492 F.2d 929 (1974)
 

HOFFMAN v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE. & W. U., LOC. NO. 10

Nos. 71-1818 to 71-1823, 71-1827 to 71-1829 and 71-2073.

492 F.2d 929 (1974)

Roy O. HOFFMAN, Director, Region 20, NLRB, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S & WAREHOUSEMEN'S UNION, LOCAL NO. 10, Defendant-Appellant. Roy O. HOFFMAN, Director, Region 20, NLRB, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS & AUTO TRUCK DRIVERS LOCAL NO. 70, IBTCWHA, and James R. Muniz, Defendants-Appellants. Roy O. HOFFMAN, Director, Region 20, NLRB, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SAN FRANCISCO TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION LOCAL NO. 21, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

As Amended March 7, 1974.

Rehearings Denied March 26, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman Leonard (argued) of Gladstein, Leonard, Patsey & Andersen, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant ILWU Local 10.

Victor J. Van Bourg, Stewart Weinberg (argued) of Levy & Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant Teamsters Local 70.

Duane B. Beeson (argued) of Brundage, Neyhart, Grodin & Beeson, San Francisco, Cal., Cecil F. Poole of Jacobs, Sills & Coblentz, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant San Fancisco Typo. Union Local 21.

Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Julius G. Serot, NLRB, Washington, D. C., Milo V. Price, Walter L. Kintz, Jr., W. David Smullin, (Roy Hoffman, Director, Region 20) NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., Marvin Roth, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C. (argued) Nathan R. Berke of Severson, Werson, Berke & Melchior, William B. Irvin of McLaughlin & Irvin, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before MERRILL and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, District Judge.

Rehearings Denied in No. 71-1818-71-1823, 71-1827 March 26, 1974.

TRASK, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from two judgments holding appellant unions and union officers guilty of civil contempt and a portion of the appellants guilty of criminal contempt. The contempt actions were based upon alleged violations of two separate injunctions issued by the District Court under section 10(l) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases