1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 62 Wis.2d
  5. 62 Wis.2d 74 (1974)
 

GEDICKS v. STATE

No. State 95.

62 Wis.2d 74 (1974)

214 N.W.2d 569

GEDICKS, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 5, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error the cause was submitted on the briefs of Jack W. Van Metre of Madison, and for the defendant in error the cause was submitted on the brief of Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and Steven B. Wickland, assistant attorney general.

ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

By writs of error the defendant raises issues involving: (1) Sufficiency of the evidence; (2) testability of evidence relied upon by prosecution; and (3) reference to defendant's silence to impeach his testimony.

Sufficiency of evidence. On the issue of sufficiency of evidence, the defense offered testimony which, if believed by the court, would have required acquittal. However, the state offered credible evidence, believed by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases