AURARIA BUSINESS. AGAINST CON., INC. v. DENVER U.R.A.

No. 26059.

517 P.2d 845 (1974)

AURARIA BUSINESSMEN AGAINST CONFISCATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DENVER URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY, Defendant-Appellee.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

January 14, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jon L. Holm, Peter D. Willis, Denver, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Berge, Martin & Clark, William G. Berge, Paul C. Benedetti, Denver, for defendant-appellee.


LEE, Justice.

This appeal involves the application and constitutionality of the relocation payment provisions of the Urban Renewal Law, C.R.S. 1963, 139-62-1, et seq., and the Relocation Assistance and Land Acquisition Policies Act, 1971 Perm.Supp., C.R.S.1963, 69-10-1, et seq.

Appellants sought to restrain the Denver Urban Renewal Authority (DURA) from further land acquisition activities in the Auraria urban renewal development, and to have declared unconstitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases