PALMER v. WILSON

Nos. 73-1936, 73-2705, 73-2706.

502 F.2d 860 (1974)

Austin C. PALMER and Helen M. Palmer, husband and wife, Appellees, v. Gladys S. WILSON et al., Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

August 16, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sanford N. Diller (argued), San Jose, Cal., for appellants.

Ronald Senoway (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.


HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs Austin and Helen Palmer brought this action under the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1665, to recover the statutory penalty and attorney fees provided in section 1640 and to enforce their right of rescission pursuant to section 1635. The district court granted plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and awarded both forms of relief requested; the defendants appeal.

The record before the district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases