KELLY, Judge.
Appellants, the judgment debtors, take this appeal from an order of the trial court denying what appellants denominated an "Intervention;" a petition whereby they sought to intervene in a garnishment proceeding. We affirm.
On appeal they present one point: that the trial court erred in dismissing their motion to intervene. They contend that they were proper parties to intervene under Rule 90.08, V.A.M.R.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
