U.S. HERTZ, INC. v. NIOBRARA FARMS

Docket No. 13662.

41 Cal.App.3d 68 (1974)

116 Cal. Rptr. 44

U.S. HERTZ, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NIOBRARA FARMS et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

July 15, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Arata, Misuraca, Clement & Haley, Arata, Misuraca & Clement, Malcolm Misuraca, John R. Hetland and Thiel, Bolton & Cornblum for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Landels, Ripley & Diamond, Edgar Washburn, Crowe, Mitchell & Crowe, J. Thomas Crowe, and Laughlin, Pugh & McGlynn, Craig & Christensen for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

GOLDSTEIN, J.*

Plaintiffs U.S. Hertz, Inc. (herein "Hertz") appeals from an order dissolving a temporary restraining order and denying its motion for a preliminary injunction. Such an order is appealable. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (f).)

Facts

On July 1, 1971, plaintiff submitted to defendants an offer in writing entitled "Real Estate Purchase Contract and Receipt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases