RULE TO DISMISS
SAMUEL, Judge.
This is a suit for $690, plus 20% attorney's fees, allegedly due as damages under a construction contract between plaintiff and the defendant. Plaintiff appealed from a judgment dismissing both the original and the reconventional demands. The matter is before us on our ex proprio motu rule (the issue is jurisdictional) to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed on the apparent ground that the appeal bond was not filed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.