1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 208 S.E.2d
  5. 208 S.E.2d 867 (1974)
 

DUKE POWER COMPANY v. BUSICK

No. 7418SC691.

208 S.E.2d 867 (1974)

23 N.C. App. 276

DUKE POWER COMPANY v. Dan R. BUSICK and wife et al.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 16, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adams, Kleemeier, Hagan, Hannah & Fouts by M. Jay DeVaney, Greensboro, for petitioner appellant.

Dees, Johnson, Tart, Giles & Tedder by Charles R. Tedder, Greensboro, for defendant appellees.

BRITT, Judge.

By its first and second assignments of error, petitioner contends the trial court erred in admitting evidence from certain maps, contending, among other things, that the maps were inaccurate and not properly authenticated. We find no merit in these assignments. The trial judge adequately instructed the jury as to inaccuracies in the maps and that the maps were introduced solely for the purpose of illustrating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases