1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 201 S.E.2d
  5. 201 S.E.2d 873 (1974)
 

DUNN v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE

No. 76.

201 S.E.2d 873 (1974)

284 N.C. 542

John M. DUNN, Jr., et al., Petitioners, v. The CITY OF CHARLOTTE, North Carolina, Respondent. Ronald K. BROWN et al., Petitioners, v. The CITY OF CHARLOTTE, North Carolina, Respondent. John A. DeGROOT et al., Petitioners, v. The CITY OF CHARLOTTE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Casey & Daly, P. A. by Hugh G. Casey, Jr., Charlotte, for petitioner appellants.

Henry W. Underhill, Jr., H. Michael Boyd and W. A. Watts, Charlotte, for respondent appellee.

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

The authority of the Council to extend the corporate limits of Charlotte is conferred by G.S. § 160-453.14. The procedure is prescribed by G.S. § 160-453.17.

In each case, the court properly concluded that the record of the annexation proceedings on its face showed substantial compliance with every essential element of the applicable statutes. Therefore, the burden was upon petitioners, who appealed from the annexation ordinance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases