PER CURIAM.
By an information the appellant was charged in one count with possession of narcotic implements and in a second count with unlawful possession of marijuana. He was acquitted of the first charge and convicted of the second. On this appeal therefrom it is contended the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction and that possession of marijuana is not possession of an "hallucinogenic drug" as proscribed in the statute under which the charge was laid...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
