1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 46 A.D.2d
  5. 46 A.D.2d 1001 (1974)
 

STATE DIV. OF HUMAN RIGHTS v. GREAT ATL. & PAC. TEA CO., INC.

46 A.D.2d 1001 (1974)

State Division of Human Rights, Respondent, v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., Petitioner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

December 12, 1974

Determination and order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum, and as modified confirmed, without costs.

Memorandum:

Under section 298 of the Executive Law, A & P argues that the complaint should be dismissed because the division did not determine the question of jurisdiction and probable cause nor hold a hearing and make a final determination within the time periods provided by section 297 of the Executive Law. Complainant, 59 years of age...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases