MARASTONI v. LUCEY


521 P.2d 521 (1974)

Attilio J. MARASTONI and Julia M. Marastoni Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. Arthur J. LUCEY and Paul A. Krumm, Respondents. Arthur J. Lucey and Paul A. Krumm, Respondents, v. Attilio J. Marastoni and Julia M. Marastoni, Husband and Wife, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided April 25, 1974.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fredrick Siegrist, Springfield, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Sanders, Lively & Wiswall, Springfield.

Jack A. Gardner, Eugene, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.


BRYSON, Justice.

Consolidated in this opinion are two appeals by Attilio and Julia Marastoni from a separate decree and judgment.

Marastoni v. Lucey and Krumm is a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement to extend the term of lease on an existing written lease to April, 1975. The trial court found for defendants Lucey and Krumm and dismissed the complaint.

Lucey and Krumm v. Marastoni is a forcible entry and detainer action, filed shortly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases