1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 33 N.Y.2d
  5. 33 N.Y.2d 989 (1974)
 

ORTIZ v. UHL

33 N.Y.2d 989 (1974)

Roman Ortiz, Appellant, v. William F. Uhl et al., Individually and Doing Business as Uhl, Hall & Rich, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 14, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Phelan for appellant.

Joseph J. Mansour and Salem G. Mansour for respondents.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STEVENS concur in memorandum; Judge GABRIELLI taking no part.

MEMORANDUM.

The court affirms on the authority of Bidetto v. New York City Housing Auth. (25 N.Y.2d 848). No basis establishing a duty of care by the defendants herein has been shown. Neither the Power Authority nor Uhl, Hall & Rich furnished Merritt with any tools, equipment or employees, or made any determination as to the methods by which the contractor should perform the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases