1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 222 N.W.2d
  5. 222 N.W.2d 799 (1974)
 

HORNBLOWER & WEEKS-HEMPHILL NOYES v. LAZERE

No. 44556.

222 N.W.2d 799 (1974)

HORNBLOWER & WEEKS-HEMPHILL NOYES, Appellant, v. Arthur B. LAZERE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

October 25, 1974.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gray, Plant, Mooty & Anderson and Daniel R. Shulman, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Meagher, Geer, Markham, Anderson, Adamson, Flaskamp & Brennan and J. Richard Bland, and O. C. Adamson II, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.

MacLAUGHLIN, Justice.

In November 1968, defendant, Arthur B. Lazere, established a cash account for the purchase and sale of stock with plaintiff, Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill Noyes, a stockbrokerage house. Laurence Orrick, a stockbroker-employee, was plaintiff's agent for defendant's account. Business was transacted at plaintiff's Minneapolis office, but the stock which defendant purchased was kept by plaintiff with defendant's permission at its home office in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases