BOQUIST v. DAYTON-HUDSON CORPORATION

No. 44103.

209 N.W.2d 783 (1973)

Earl BOQUIST, Relator, v. DAYTON-HUDSON CORPORATION, self-insured, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 13, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sween & Salazar and Harlan G. Sween, Minneapolis, for relator.

Faegre & Benson and George W. Flynn and G. Alan Cunningham, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Scholle, Schweiger & Scholle and Mark Scholle, Minneapolis, amicus curiae.

Heard and considered en banc.


KELLY, Justice.

Writ of certiorari to the Workmen's Compensation Commission to review its decision denying employee-relator simultaneous benefits for permanent total disability and permanent partial disability. We affirm.

Before injuries led to his eventual inability to work, Earl Boquist was a fork truck operator, employed by respondent, Dayton-Hudson Corporation. While so employed, he injured his left knee on a number of occasions between 1961 and 1963....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases