SZOZDA v. SLATTERY CONSTR. CORP.


42 A.D.2d 946 (1973)

Eugene Szozda, Respondent, v. Slattery Construction Corporation, Defendant, and Consolidated Edison, Appellant New Amsterdam Motor Transportation Corporation, Respondent, v. Slattery Construction Corporation, Defendant, and Consolidated Edison Company, Appellant Ruby Nash Distributors, Inc., Respondent, v. City of New York, Respondent, and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 18, 1973


Appellant shall recover of respondents $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal.

We adopt the reasoning and findings contained in the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Term except the conclusion that a new trial should be had. As did Justice Quinn, we feel that the evidence discloses no negligence on the part of the appellant, but if such there be, it appears at least equally likely that the accident was caused by the highway plating installed by an undisclosed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases