The order is otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.
By previous court order defendant had been granted the right to visit with his infant son every Sunday. Concededly, plaintiff removed the child to California. The real issue, therefore, appears to be whether defendant consented to the child's prolonged absence from New York. Under the terms of the visitation order plaintiff's movements were not restricted. Indeed she could travel with the child...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
