PIKE v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 1 CA-IC 743.

20 Ariz. App. 76 (1973)

510 P.2d 387

James A. PIKE, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Barlow Appliance Co., Respondent Employer, Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

June 5, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Finn, Finn & Wilkes, Ltd., by Herbert B. Finn and Galen H. Wilkes, Phoenix, for petitioner.

William C. Wahl, Jr., Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Ariz., Phoenix, for respondent.

Gust, Rosenfeld & Divelbess by James M. Koontz, Phoenix, for respondents employer and carrier.


DONOFRIO, Presiding Judge.

This case is before the Court by writ of certiorari to review the lawfulness of an award and findings of The Industrial Commission of Arizona. The principal issue is whether the award and findings are reasonably supported by the record.

On October 27, 1969 petitioner, 57 years of age, was deliberating a washing machine for respondent employer. He was having difficulty in maneuvering the machine, and while trying to zigzag it up some...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases