BROCK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff assigns as error that the findings of fact of the Industrial Commission do not support its conclusion and opinion.
Under the evidence in this case the question of whether a person of ordinary prudence would have acted under the same or similar circumstances was to be determined by the finder of the facts. In this case the Commission was the finder of the facts and its finding of fact supports its conclusion and opinion. The fact...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
