BOLM v. TRIUMPH CORP.


41 A.D.2d 54 (1973)

David A. Bolm et al., Appellants, v. Triumph Corporation et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

February 23, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McDonough, Boasberg, McDonough & Beltz (Paul W. Beltz of counsel), for appellants.

Hodgson, Russ, Andrews, Woods & Goodyear (R. William Larson of counsel), for respondents.

MOULE and HENRY, JJ., concur with GOLDMAN, P. J.; DEL VECCHIO, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order in an opinion in which WITMER, J., concurs.


GOLDMAN, P. J.

In this appeal from an order of Special Term which granted defendants-respondents' motion for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiffs-appellants' complaint with prejudice, the issue is the liability of respondents for a claimed design defect in the manufacture of a motorcycle. The facts are not in controversy.

Appellant David A. Bolm was operating his 1966 Triumph motorcycle, which was manufactured by respondent Birmingham Small...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases