FRANTZ v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 1 CA-IC 860.

21 Ariz. App. 73 (1973)

515 P.2d 898

Vincent C. FRANTZ, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Ram Construction (MRF Construction), Respondent Employer, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Rehearing Denied December 20, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rabinovitz & Minker, P.C., by Bernard I. Rabinovitz, Tucson, for petitioner.

William C. Wahl, Jr., Chief Counsel, Phoenix, for respondent, The Industrial Commission of Ariz.

Everett, Bury & Moeller, P.C., by J. Michael Moeller, Tucson, for respondent employer and respondent carrier.


OPINION

HAIRE, Judge.

The sole issue raised in this review of an award entered by the respondent Commission in a workmen's compensation proceeding is whether the petitioner should have been awarded compensation benefits for a three month period during which time he was outside the state of Arizona without the approval of the Commission.

The petitioner agrees that the facts show that he left the state while...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases