ROSE v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

Nos. 56775, 56776 cons.

12 Ill. App.3d 929 (1973)

299 N.E.2d 95

ALLEN J. ROSE, Individually and as Representative of the Class Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant-Appellee. WILLIAM MANSON, Individually and as Representative of the Class Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO., INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (1st Division).

June 11, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. John Mix, Jr., of Chicago, for appellants Allen J. Rose and William Manson.

Arnstein, Gluck, Weitzenfeld & Minow, of Chicago, (Burton Y. Weitzenfeld and Peter D. Kasdin, of counsel,) for appellee Sears Roebuck & Co.

Hopkins, Sutter, Owen, Mulroy & Davis, of Chicago, (Thomas R. Mulroy, William P. Sutter, William I. Goldberg, and Richard Bromley, of counsel,) for appellee Montgomery Ward & Co.


Judgment affirmed.

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE BURKE delivered the opinion of the court:

These cases originated as two class actions for injunctive relief and damages based on the defendants' practice of including both the 4% Illinois Use Tax and the 1% Municipal Retailers' Occupation Tax in the credit account balances to which a finance charge is applied. The trial court granted the defendants' motions to strike and dismiss the complaints, and the plaintiffs appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases