PER CURIAM.
We have read the briefs, the transcript and the Tax Court file. We agree with the opinion of the Tax Court on the issues raised in this case and therefore we adopt the opinion, 5 OTR Adv Sh 86 (1972).
It is appropriate that we mention one other matter not appearing in the opinion of the Tax Court.
Counsel for plaintiffs testified at length concerning the sale of plaintiffs' interest in the Arizona property in 1966 and the various tax ramifications...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.