PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
REED, C.J., and CROSS, J., concur.
WALDEN, J., dissents with opinion.
WALDEN, Judge (dissenting):
Appellant's probation was revoked. I would reverse as I feel the proofs here were insufficient as a matter of law to satisfy the conscience of the court that the restrictions were violated. Brill v. State, 159 Fla. 682, 32 So.2d 607 (1947).
The violation charged against appellant was:
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.