UNITED STATES v. AMATO

No. 73 Cr. 672-LFM.

367 F.Supp. 547 (1973)

UNITED STATES of America v. Tommaso AMATO et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

October 12, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cagney & Tifford, P.A., Miami, Fla., for defendant Mantell, William P. Cagney, III, Miami, Fla., of counsel.

William T. Griffin, New York City, for defendant Raia.

Stephen Miller, New York City, for defendant Gittleman.

Paul J. Curran, U. S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City, for United States of America; William I. Aronwald, Sp. Atty., Dept. of Justice, New York City, of counsel.


MEMORANDUM

MacMAHON, District Judge.

Defendants Mantell and Gittleman move to dismiss the indictment on various grounds. Gittleman adopts all the motions asserted by Mantell in addition to his own motions. Defendant Raia also adopts all motions made by Gittleman.

The first of the four grounds asserted by Mantell and adopted by Gittleman and Raia is that 18 U.S.C. § 1962, a statute they are charged with violating, is unconstitutional. They claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases