The sentence minutes were apparently available at the time defendant appealed from the judgment of conviction. He could have raised the allocution question at that time. He failed to do so. He may not now do so by way of a coram nobis application (People v. Sullivan,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. HINTON
41 A.D.2d 855 (1973)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert Jack Hinton, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 30, 1973
April 30, 1973
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
