1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 33 N.Y.2d
  5. 33 N.Y.2d 851 (1973)
 

PEOPLE v. S & L PROCESSING LAB, INC.

33 N.Y.2d 851 (1973)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. S & L Processing Lab, Inc., Frank Munna, Frank Tricarico and Lawrence Tobin, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 27, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold E. Wallach for appellants.

Michael F. Armstrong, District Attorney (Cornelius J. O'Brien of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, JONES and WACHTLER concur in Per Curiam opinion; Judge BREITEL dissents and votes to affirm in a separate opinion in which Judges JASEN and GABRIELLI concur.

Per Curiam.

It is manifest that the officers' direct observations were sufficient to establish probable cause for the issuance of the search warrant and, therefore, disclosure of the informant's identity was not required. (See People v. Cerrato, 24 N.Y.2d 1, 7; People v. Castro, 29 N.Y.2d 324, 326; see, also, People v. Malinsky...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases