1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 505 P.2d
  5. 505 P.2d 352 (1973)
 

DAHLSTROM v. HUNTINGTON RUBBER MILLS

505 P.2d 352 (1973)

In the matter of the Compensation of Robert DAHLSTROM, Claimant. Robert Dahlstrom, Appellant, v. HUNTINGTON RUBBER MILLS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 19, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank J. Susak, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Susak & Lawrence and Peterson, Chaivoe & Peterson, Portland.

Daryll E. Klein, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief was William L. Hallmark, Portland.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and HOLMAN, JJ.

LANGTRY, Judge.

This is a workmen's compensation case in which the claim was denied successively by the hearing officer, the Workmen's Compensation Board and the circuit court, each time because it was found that the claim was untimely filed. The question on this appeal is whether the claimant should be allowed to produce additional evidence before the hearing officer concerning the reason he gave, after the hearing, for not filing the claim in the year's time allowed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases