1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 454 Pa.
  5. 454 Pa. 391 (1973)
 

MURPHY and SLOTA v. BURKE et al.

454 Pa. 391 (1973)

Murphy and Slota, Appellants, v. Burke et al.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

November 26, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard V. DiGiacomo, for appellants.

Harold W. Spencer, with him Wright, Spencer, Manning & Sagendorph, for appellees.

Before JONES, C.J., EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE POMEROY, November 26, 1973:

The appellants, L. Francis Murphy and Robert E. Slota, are attorneys and members of the Bar of Montgomery County. They brought an action in equity against the Norristown, Pennsylvania law firm of Haws & Burke, a professional corporation, and against Thomas J. Burke, James S. Kilpatrick, Jr. and Ralph L. Hose, the three lawyers practicing in that firm. In their complaint plaintiffs recited that "for some period...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases