1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 60 Wis.2d
  5. 60 Wis.2d 767 (1973)
 

BOYLES v. STATE

No. State 96.

60 Wis.2d 767 (1973)

211 N.W.2d 512

BOYLES, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 30, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error the cause was submitted on the brief of Daniel D. Sobel of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was submitted on the brief of Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and Christine M. Wiseman, assistant attorney general.

Submitted under sec. (Rule) 251.54 October 3, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

This court concludes after a review of the record the plaintiff in error's claim that the trial court improperly received and considered as substantive evidence a written prior inconsistent statement of a hostile witness presented by the prosecution, is without merit.

There is nothing in this record to suggest the trial court improperly considered the statement as substantive evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases