Submitted under sec. (Rule) 251.54 October 3, 1973.
PER CURIAM.
The only issue in this case is whether the evidence considered most favorably to the conviction is so insufficient that no trier of facts acting reasonably could be convinced of the guilt of plaintiff in error beyond reasonable doubt. The elements of the crime for which plaintiff in error was convicted include obtaining property of another by deceiving him with a promise made with
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.