STEWART v. STATE

No. State 36.

57 Wis.2d 763 (1973)

204 N.W.2d 679

STEWART, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 27, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error the cause was submitted on the brief of C. M. Bye and Gaylord & Bye, all of River Falls.

For the defendant in error the cause was submitted on the brief of Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and Robert B. McConnell, assistant attorney general.


PER CURIAM.

The single issue raised on this review of the denial of the defendant's sec. 974.06, Stats., motion for postconviction relief is whether he had effective representation of counsel at his trial. After reviewing the record and in accordance with the test for effective representation by counsel as established in Pulaski v. State (1964), 23 Wis.2d 138, 126 N.W.2d 625, the court concludes that defendant's counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases