Order modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting therefrom the adjudication that the act in question would also have constituted grand larceny and unlawful use of a vehicle. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs.
In our opinion, the adjudication with respect to possession of stolen property was justified by the proof, but the trial court should not also have made the guilty adjudication with reference to grand larceny and unlawful use...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
