1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 30 Cal.App.3d
  5. 30 Cal.App.3d 778 (1973)
 

HODO v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 12397.

30 Cal.App.3d 778 (1973)

106 Cal. Rptr. 547

DEWEY C. HODO, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

February 22, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Arthur E. Lester for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Byron C. Morton, District Attorney, Howard M. Dabney, Assistant District Attorney, Terrence R. Boren, Ronald S. Smith and Ronald Schwartz, Deputy District Attorneys, for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

GARDNER, P.J.

In 1968, People v. King, 266 Cal.App.2d 437 [72 Cal.Rptr. 478], held, based on the record before the court at that time, that evidence of spectrogram or voiceprint identification was inadmissible. However, the court did not close the door on the eventual admissibility of this technique assuming that future events...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases