STATE v. CLARK

No. 7315SC453.

197 S.E.2d 605 (1973)

18 N.C. App. 621

STATE of North Carolina v. Alphonzo CLARK.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 11, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Robert Morgan by Howard P. Satisky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Chambers, Stein, Ferguson & Lanning by Adam Stein, Chapel Hill, for defendant appellant.


BRITT, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for a bill of particulars, contending that the court violated G.S. § 15-143 and his right to due process of law. This assignment has no merit. The statute clearly provides that a motion for a bill of particulars is addressed to the discretion of the trial judge and our courts have held consistently that the trial judge's ruling on the motion is not subject to review except for palpable and gross...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases