1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 58 Wis.2d
  5. 58 Wis.2d 739 (1973)
 

FITE v. STATE

No. State 25.

58 Wis.2d 739 (1973)

207 N.W.2d 672

FITE, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 5, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error the cause was submitted on the brief of J. D. McKay of Green Bay.

For the defendant in error the cause was submitted on the brief of Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and James H. McDermott, assistant attorney general.

PER CURIAM.

The court concludes the trial court correctly and completely responded to the jury's inquiry of whether the defendant could be convicted on only an accomplice's testimony. Testimony of an accomplice, even if it is uncorroborated, can support a verdict of guilty if it is of such a nature that it is entitled to belief. Jandrt v. State (1969), 43 Wis.2d 497, 499, 168 N.W.2d 602

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases