INVESTMENT EXCH. v. HILLCREST BOWL

No. 42674.

82 Wn.2d 714 (1973)

513 P.2d 282

INVESTMENT EXCHANGE REALTY, INC., Respondent, v. HILLCREST BOWL, INC., et al., Petitioners.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

August 16, 1973.


WRIGHT, J.

This is an action by a real estate broker to recover a commission for negotiation of a lease. The question presented is whether a broker has a duty to expressly disclose a dual agency in which the broker represented both the lessor and the lessee.

The facts are not disputed although there is a very real dispute as to the interpretation to be placed on the facts. Hillcrest Bowl, Inc. (appellant) is the owner...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases