1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 360 F.Supp.
  5. 360 F.Supp. 436 (1973)
 

WARSHAWSKY & COMPANY v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 4410; Protest No. 70/45933-16595.

360 F.Supp. 436 (1973)

WARSHAWSKY & COMPANY v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court.

February 27, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schwartz & Lidstrom, Chicago, Ill., and Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, New York City (Robert E. Burke, Chicago, Ill., and Earl R. Lidstrom, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Harlington Wood, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. (Patrick D. Gill and Andrew P. Vance, New York City, trial attorneys), for defendant.

LANDIS, Judge:

This case involves the tariff classification of grill mounted fog and driving lights imported from Japan and entered at Chicago on March 13, 1969.

The merchandise here involved to wit: grill mounted 12-volt spot (driving) lights and grill mounted 12-volt fog lights, was classified by customs officials under that tariff provision which provides for illuminating articles, of base metal, dutiable under TSUS (Tariff Schedules of the United States...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases