Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interests of justice, by changing the provision that the sentence be consecutive to one that the sentence shall run concurrently with the one imposed January 12, 1971. As so modified, judgment affirmed.
In our opinion, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to provide that the sentence be consecutive to, rather than concurrent with, the prior...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.