BARNES v. ANGE

No. 732DC419.

198 S.E.2d 581 (1973)

19 N.C. App. 306

Walter BARNES v. Howard ANGE and wife, Artie B. Ange.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 29, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hutchins & Romanet, by R. W. Hutchins, Plymouth, for plaintiff.

Bailey & Cockrell, by Arthur E. Cockrell, Plymouth, for defendants.


BROCK, Chief Judge.

The defendants assign as error that the trial judge sustained the objection to and allowed plaintiff's motion to strike the testimony of Mr. Furcy concerning the cost of necessary repairs. Defendants argue that testimony of an expert witness is admissible in evidence. This is true, but there must be an admission or stipulation that the witness is an expert, or there must be a determination by the trial judge that the witness is an expert, before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases