PER CURIAM.
Appellant defendant seeks review of his convictions and sentences on the charges of unlawful sale and possession of a narcotic drug.
Upon careful consideration of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, we have concluded that no reversible error regarding appellant's convictions has been made to appear. However, we have noted, and the state has conceded an error in the sentencing of the appellant. See, Yost v. State, Fla.App. 1971,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.