GIANT OF MARYLAND, INC.
v.
STATE'S ATTORNEY FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY
v.
THE GRAND UNION COMPANY AND SAFEWAY STORES, INCORPORATED
Court of Appeals of Maryland.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 2, 1973.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, May 29, 1973.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Joseph D. Tydings, with whom were Aaron Handleman, Robert D. Roadman and Danzansky, Dickey, Tydings, Quint & Gordon on the brief, for appellant in No. 116.
Clarence W. Sharp, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, Arthur A. Marshall, Jr., State's Attorney, and Alan E. D'Appolito and John B. Wynes, Assistant State's Attorneys for Prince George's County, on the brief, for appellee in No. 116 and appellant in No. 149.
Hal C.B. Clagett, with whom were Sasscer, Clagett, Channing & Bucher on the brief, for appellee The Grand Union Company, and W. Frank Stickle, Jr., with whom were Hanson, O'Brien, Birney, Stickle & Butler on the brief, for appellee Safeway Stores, Incorporated, in No. 149.
Amicus Curiae briefs filed in No. 116 by Montgomery County, Maryland, Richard S. McKernon, County Attorney, Alfred H. Carter, Deputy County Attorney, and William J. Chen, Jr., Assistant County Attorney, on the brief; by S.S. Kresge Company, J. Gibson Semmes, Harry A. Inman, David B. Robinson, Patton, Boggs, Blow, Verrill, Brand & May and James C. Tuttle on the brief; and by Safeway Stores, Incorporated, W. Frank Stickle, Jr., and Hanson, O'Brien, Birney, Stickle & Butler on the brief.
The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ., in No. 116 and before MURPHY, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES and LEVINE, JJ., in No. 149.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, Supreme Court of the United States, May 29, 1973.
MURPHY, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
These appeals bring into question the construction and constitutionality of § 534H of Article 27 of the Maryland Code (1957, 1971 Repl. Vol.). This statute, one of many included among the mass of so-called "Sunday Blue Laws" enacted by the General Assembly...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
