Based on assignments of error one and two, defendant contends the trial court erred in not finding that the victim's in-court identification of the defendant was tainted by "questionable and illegal extrajudicial viewings of the defendant".
Defendant did not object to the victim's in-court identification of him as the man who broke into her home and attempted to rape her. Where a defendant fails...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
