1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 194 S.E.2d
  5. 194 S.E.2d 560 (1973)
 

HAMM v. TEXACO INCORPORATED

No. 7323DC153.

194 S.E.2d 560 (1973)

17 N.C. App. 451

Ray HAMM and Roe Church v. TEXACO INCORPORATED et al.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 28, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold L. Young, Sparta, for plaintiff-appellants.

Hayes & Hayes by Kyle Hayes and Douglas L. Winslow, North Wilkesboro, for defendant-appellees.

BROCK, Judge.

Plaintiffs assign as error the trial judge's entry of a judgment, pursuant to G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 41(b), dismissing the plaintiffs' action. This assignment of error presents the question whether there was sufficient evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, to establish the existence of a contract between the plaintiffs and the defendants.

In Horton v. Refining Company, 255 N.C. 675

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases