COLON v. AUTOMATIC RETAILERS


74 Misc.2d 665 (1973)

Victoria Colon, Respondent, v. Automatic Retailers Association Service, Inc., Also Known as Ara Service, Inc., Appellant, and British Overseas Airways Corporation, Also Known as BOAC, Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff. Collins M. Ward et al., Third-Party Defendants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

July 27, 1973


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mele & Cullen (Joseph D. Ahearn of counsel), for appellant. Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz & Damashek (Lewis I. Wolf of counsel), for Victoria Colon, respondent. Chadbourne, Parke, Whiteside & Wolff (Edward F. Hayes, III, Paul G. Pennoyer, Jr., and Frank A. Sherer, Jr., of counsel), for British Overseas Airways Corporation, respondent.

Concur — MARKOWITZ, P. J., LUPIANO and QUINN, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The introduction into evidence of photographs of the accident site showing subsequent alterations coupled with plaintiff's arguments that the lack of such alterations as of the date of the accident constituted negligence was prejudicial error. (See Cahill v. Kleinberg, 233 N.Y. 255; Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Int., 60 Misc.2d 840.)

The award of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases