1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 261 S.C.
  5. 261 S.C. 478 (1973)
 

STATE v. RICHLAND COUNTY COURT

19730

261 S.C. 478 (1973)

200 S.E.2d 843

STATE of South Carolina, ex rel. Daniel R. McLEOD, Attorney General, Petitioner, v. The COUNTY COURT OF RICHLAND COUNTY, South Carolina, and William Floyd Baskins, Respondents. STATE of South Carolina, ex rel. Daniel R. McLEOD, Attorney General, Petitioner, v. The COUNTY COURT OF RICHLAND COUNTY, South Carolina, and Inez Nelson, Respondents. STATE of South Carolina, ex rel. Daniel R. McLEOD, Attorney General, Petitioner, v. The COUNTY COURT OF RICHLAND COUNTY, South Carolina, and Minnie Marie Taylor by her guardian ad Litem, Hermine Taylor, Respondents. STATE of South Carolina, ex rel. Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General, Petitioner, v. The COUNTY COURT OF RICHLAND COUNTY, South Carolina, and Russell Wayne "Rusty" Wyly by his Guardian ad Litem, Joseph C. Wyly, Jr., Respondents.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

November 29, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen., C. Tolbert Goolsby, Jr., Dept. Atty. Gen., and John W. Foard, Jr., Sol., of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Walter Brooks, Esq. of Columbia, for Respondent, William Floyd Baskins.

John M. Young, Esq., Richland County Public Defender, of Columbia, for Respondents, Inez Nelson and Minnie Marie Taylor.

Thomas C. Mann, Esq. of Columbia, for Respondent, Russell Wayne "Rusty" Wyly.

Terrell L. Glenn, Esq., of Columbia, for Respondent, Richland County Court.

November 29, 1973.

Per Curiam:

The matters involved in this opinion are before the Court as a result of writs of certiorari issued by the Chief Justice, ordering the Richland County Court to certify and return to this Court true copies of all records in any way affecting and relating to its orders amending the original sentences of the four individual respondents: William Floyd Baskins, Inez Nelson, Minnie Marie Taylor, and Russell Wayne "Rusty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases